共收录 18 篇深度内容（其中 11 条为规则摘要兜底）
📌 今日概览
- 记忆机制成今日主线：Anthropic 发布 Claude dreaming 机制，Meta 同期公布 Muse Wonder 专业模型训练方案。
- 产品侧将专业模型接入 Muse 与 Meta AI，宣称遗忘关键信息减少 2.4 倍、受约束变化卡住改善 67%。
- Gary Marcus 判断生成式 AI 未终结，但高估值与数据中心投资狂潮可能收场，更可靠的新架构才值钱。
- 开发者用 three.js 与 opus 5.5 做出类《博德之门 3》回合制作品，AI 编程门槛继续下探。
🔥 必读 Top3
- Anthropic Anthropic 介绍其工程博客新文：Claude 通过“ dreaming”（梦境）整理所学、纠正错误，并更易在下次找到所需内容，强调记忆让 Claude 从经验中学习。
入选理由：官方一手披露，互动量全场最高；记忆机制是今日最集中的技术信号。 - AI at Meta Meta 宣布把用 Muse Wonder 训练的专业模型接入 Muse 与 Meta AI；据其称，Muse 中遗忘关键信息减少 2.4 倍、受约束变化卡住情况改善 67%。
入选理由：官方声明附具体量化指标，给出 Muse 系列训练方法可验证的改善幅度。 - Gary Marcus 作者给出五点预测：生成式 AI 并未终结，但超高估值与数据中心投资狂潮可能结束；未来更可靠的架构会取代当下 AI，新一代 AI 才真正值钱。
入选理由：涵盖估值、算力投资与架构更替，是今日最具分量的反向判断。
🧭 主题分组
- 记忆机制（2 条）—— Anthropic 与 Meta 同日让模型整理、保留所学，记忆正从附加功能转向核心能力。
- AI 预测（1 条）—— 对生成式 AI 高估值与数据中心投资的质疑升温，架构更替被视为下一轮分水岭。
- AI 编程（1 条）—— 个人开发者借 opus 5.5 与 three.js 独立完成大型回合制游戏原型。
- AI 安全（1 条）—— 围绕模型拒绝防护与编码代理改做安全审计的讨论，暴露权限边界问题。
- 宇宙扩张（1 条）—— Schmidhuber 重申自我复制机器人工厂将按太阳系、银河系、宇宙逐级扩张。
- 创业风波（1 条）—— 创业者称 Claude 未能搞垮其公司、用户反增，原文缺少过程细节。
- 其他（11 条）—— 杂项推文涉及体育、治安、加密与社会评论，与 AI 主线关联较弱。
📖 详细内容
记忆机制
Anthropic 与 Meta 同日让模型整理、保留所学，记忆正从附加功能转向核心能力。
Anthropic
｜ @AnthropicAI
｜ 影响力: 188.4万粉丝 · 互动分 9931.0
Anthropic
｜ @AnthropicAI
｜ 影响力: 188.4万粉丝 · 互动分 9931.0
💡 核心观点: Anthropic 介绍其工程博客新文：Claude 通过“ dreaming”（梦境）整理所学、纠正错误，并更易在下次找到所需内容，强调记忆让 Claude 从经验中学习。
可信度: 88/100
事实核查:
- 原文支持: Memory is what allows Claude to learn from experience（原文直接给出此判断，属于公司自述的产品理念，缺少可核验的外部数据支撑。）
- 原文支持: “dreaming” helps Claude organize what it’s learned, correct its mistakes（原文称这是工程博客分享的内容，但推文未给出具体方法或数据，属对博客的概述。）
- 原文支持: In a new Engineering Blog post, we share how …（推文附有博客链接，但未提供可核验的细节或实验结果。）
原文内容:
Memory is what allows Claude to learn from experience. In a new Engineering Blog post, we share how “dreaming” helps Claude organize what it’s learned, correct its mistakes, and find what it needs more easily the next time. https://t.co/uUEN4bNkr9
⏰ 21:16 | ❤️ 7161 点赞 | 📝 42词 | 入选: 高赞 7161 | 查看原文 →
AI at Meta
｜ @AIatMeta
｜ 影响力: 88.0万粉丝 · 互动分 1054.5
AI at Meta
｜ @AIatMeta
｜ 影响力: 88.0万粉丝 · 互动分 1054.5
💡 核心观点: Meta 宣布把用 Muse Wonder 训练的专业模型接入 Muse 与 Meta AI；据其称，Muse 中遗忘关键信息减少 2.4 倍、受约束变化卡住情况改善 67%。
可信度: 80/100
事实核查:
- 原文支持: These specialized models include Muse Wonder's Active Memory and Active Focus
- 原文支持: the improved models show a 2.4x reduction in forgetting information critical to your goals and a 67% improvement in getting unstuck as constraints evolve
- 原文支持: Today we're bringing specialized models trained using Muse Wonder to @Muse and Meta AI
原文内容:
Today we're bringing specialized models trained using Muse Wonder to @Muse and Meta AI, giving users access to some of Muse Wonder's frontier capabilities for complex tasks at work and in everyday life. These specialized models include Muse Wonder's Active Memory and Active Focus, helping them stay aligned with your goals as tasks unfold: → Active Memory helps recognize when earlier information matters and distinguish what's still relevant from what's become stale → Active Focus helps recover from setbacks or find alternatives when constraints change In Muse, the improved models show a 2.4x reduction in forgetting information critical to your goals and a 67% improvement in getting unstuck as constraints evolve. That means less repeating yourself and fewer dead ends when plans change. In Meta AI, these improvements help it break complex problems into steps, ask sharper follow-up questions and adapt when you change direction. Read more on our research blog: https://t.co/ACWFr9xPtS
⏰ 18:14 | ❤️ 576 点赞 | 📝 156词 | 入选: 高赞 576 / 长文 | 查看原文 →
AI 预测
对生成式 AI 高估值与数据中心投资的质疑升温，架构更替被视为下一轮分水岭。
Gary Marcus
｜ @GaryMarcus
｜ 影响力: 25.6万粉丝 · 互动分 666.99
Gary Marcus
｜ @GaryMarcus
｜ 影响力: 25.6万粉丝 · 互动分 666.99
💡 核心观点: 作者给出五点预测：生成式 AI 并未终结，但超高估值与数据中心投资狂潮可能结束；未来更可靠的架构会取代当下 AI，新一代 AI 才真正值钱。
可信度: 30/100
事实核查:
- 原文支持: What might actually be over is the era of insanely high valuations – for generative AI — and exponentially increasing investments in data centers.
- 原文支持: New, more reliable architectures will eventually displace today's AI, but it may take several years, or more.
- 原文支持: A newer generation of AI will actually be worth a lot of money; this one was overrated
原文内容:
Five predictions about what might come next: 1. AI isn’t not over. [Did anyone actually say “AI is over” after the DeepSeek moment? (I did not. Is anyone saying that now? I am not.] 2. What might actually be over is the era of insanely high valuations - for generative AI — and exponentially increasing investments in data centers. 3. People will continue to use generative AI (now mostly via harnessed neurosymbolic models with tools and loops rather than the once dominant pure LLMs that are no longer popular). 4. New, more reliable architectures will eventually displace today’s AI, but it may take several years, or more. 5. A newer generation of AI will actually be worth a lot of money; this one was overrated and people will eventually see that in hindsight. cc @dee_bosa
⏰ 10:42 | ❤️ 397 点赞 | 📝 129词 | 入选: 高赞 397 / 长文 | 查看原文 →
AI 编程
个人开发者借 opus 5.5 与 three.js 独立完成大型回合制游戏原型。
Meng To
｜ @MengTo
｜ 影响力: 19.0万粉丝 · 互动分 803.95
Meng To
｜ @MengTo
｜ 影响力: 19.0万粉丝 · 互动分 803.95
💡 核心观点: 作者称一直想做一款类似《博德之门 3》的回合制游戏，这个作品用 three.js 和 opus 5.5 完成。
可信度: 50/100
事实核查:
- 原文支持: This is all done with three.js and opus 5.5
- 原文支持: Always wanted to make a turn-based game like baldur's gate 3.
原文内容:
Always wanted to make a turn-based game like baldur's gate 3. This is all done with three.js and opus 5.5 https://t.co/6IvmB3fF2R
⏰ 06:24 | ❤️ 587 点赞 | 📝 24词 | 入选: 高赞 587 | 查看原文 →
AI 安全
围绕模型拒绝防护与编码代理改做安全审计的讨论，暴露权限边界问题。
Marc Lou
｜ @marclou
｜ 影响力: 42.3万粉丝 · 互动分 624.53
Marc Lou
｜ @marclou
｜ 影响力: 42.3万粉丝 · 互动分 624.53
💡 核心观点: 作者抱怨 OpenAI 模型不让自己做防护，并询问非网络安全组织能否进入 Daybreak；他引用一条把编码代理变成安全审计团队的开源技能推文。
可信度: 35/100
事实核查:
- 原文支持: OpenAI models won't let me protect myself.
- 原文支持: Is it possible to get into Daybreak as a non-cyber security organization?
原文内容:
OpenAI models won't let me protect myself. Is it possible to get into Daybreak as a non-cyber security organization? https://t.co/5xLF13Kr76
引用 @CloudflareDev: With the recent wave of vulnerability disclosures, it’s a good time to take a closer look at your own code.
Turn your coding agent into a team of security auditors with the open-source skill that seeded Cloudflare’s vulnerability discovery harness.
The 6 phase approach:
1. Map the codebase
2. Hunt…
⏰ 09:48 | ❤️ 383 点赞 | 📝 24词 | 入选: 高赞 383 / 引用讨论 | 查看原文 →
宇宙扩张
Schmidhuber 重申自我复制机器人工厂将按太阳系、银河系、宇宙逐级扩张。
Jürgen Schmidhuber
｜ @SchmidhuberAI
｜ 影响力: 22.7万粉丝 · 互动分 1126.0
Jürgen Schmidhuber
｜ @SchmidhuberAI
｜ 影响力: 22.7万粉丝 · 互动分 1126.0
💡 核心观点: 我自 20 世纪 70 年代以来一直在思考这个问题；超级智能 AI 将先以自我复制、自我改进的机器人工厂改造太阳系，再在几十万年内改造直径约 10 万光年的整个银河系，最终用数十亿年改造可及宇宙。
可信度: 55/100
事实核查:
- 原文支持: they will start by transforming the solar system through countless self-replicating, self-improving robot factories
- 原文支持: In a few hundred thousand years (just a moment on a cosmic scale), they will have transformed the entire galaxy, which has a diameter of about 100,000 light-years.
- 原文支持: In a few tens of billions of years, they will have transformed the rest of the reachable universe.
原文内容:
I have thought about this since the 1970s. See the summary in Sec. 20 of reference [1]: What will supersmart AIs do? As indicated above, they will start by transforming the solar system through countless self-replicating, self-improving robot factories. But that won't be the end of it. In a few hundred thousand years (just a moment on a cosmic scale), they will have transformed the entire galaxy, which has a diameter of about 100,000 light-years. (The last millennium saw many reasonable proposals for interstellar travel, which is much easier for robots than for fragile humans.) Over time, AIs will set up physical senders and receivers everywhere, allowing them to travel by radio, just as they do in our labs today. In a few tens of billions of years, they will have transformed the rest of the reachable universe. Despite the light-speed limit, the expanding AI sphere will have ample time to colonize and shape the entire visible cosmos [TED12][SA17]. Perhaps all of this has already started elsewhere in the universe. Then why don't we see any signs of intelligence out there? (The Fermi paradox.) I've thought about this a lot. When I was a boy, I read about the vast empty spaces observed between clusters of galaxies. My first idea was that they were expanding bubbles colonized by AIs that used most of the local energy, making those bubbles appear dark. Then, I learned that gravity itself is sufficient to explain the sparse, large-scale network structure of the universe. Next, I thought that the mysterious "dark matter," which makes up most of the universe's mass, might be stars whose energy is used by AI civilizations whose communications are so well encrypted that they appear as random noise to us. However, this also seemed implausible because dark matter is present in all galaxies, including our own. So, why are there any stars left in the Milky Way whose energy hasn't been used yet? And why aren't we bombarded with non-encrypted construction plans from AIs that want to spread via radio without first building physical receivers far from their origins? Today, I think it's possible that our planet is the first in our light cone to spawn an expanding AI bubble. Earth's multi-billion-year window for biological evolution is almost over. In a few hundred million years, the sun will be too hot for life as we know it. Perhaps humans were incredibly lucky to evolve in time to invent agriculture, civilization, book printing, and AIs just a few hundred years later. If we are indeed the first, then this implies a great deal of responsibility, not just for our biosphere, but for the future of the entire universe. Let's not mess this up. [1] Annotated History of Modern AI and Deep Learning. Technical Report IDSIA-22-22, IDSIA, Lugano, Switzerland, 2022-2025. Preprint arXiv:2212.11279. https://t.co/Ys0dw5hSuC
⏰ 08:59 | ❤️ 755 点赞 | 📝 482词 | 入选: 高赞 755 / 长文 | 查看原文 →
创业风波
创业者称 Claude 未能搞垮其公司、用户反增，原文缺少过程细节。
Anthony Pompliano 🌪
｜ @APompliano
｜ 影响力: 244.0万粉丝 · 互动分 907.0
Anthony Pompliano 🌪
｜ @APompliano
｜ 影响力: 244.0万粉丝 · 互动分 907.0
💡 核心观点: 作者称 Claude 试图搞垮他的公司，但没有成功，公司用户反而变多；原文仅给出链接，未说明具体过程。
可信度: 25/100
事实核查:
- 原文支持: Claude just tried to kill our company.
- 原文支持: It didn't work and @cfosilvia actually got more users.
原文内容:
Claude just tried to kill our company. It didn’t work and @cfosilvia actually got more users. Here is how we did it… https://t.co/IoiAWV2LMM
⏰ 18:02 | ❤️ 570 点赞 | 📝 26词 | 入选: 高赞 570 | 查看原文 →
其他
杂项推文涉及体育、治安、加密与社会评论，与 AI 主线关联较弱。
Aakash Gupta
｜ @aakashgupta
｜ 影响力: 33.7万粉丝 · 互动分 7592.5
Aakash Gupta
｜ @aakashgupta
｜ 影响力: 33.7万粉丝 · 互动分 7592.5
💡 核心观点: A guy got kicked out of an NBA game Wednesday night for throwing the ball back to the ref.（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
A guy got kicked out of an NBA game Wednesday night for throwing the ball back to the ref. He used a chest pass, the same one your gym teacher taught you in fourth grade. The ref he threw it to is 6'1" and played college basketball. Her name is Chelisa Painter, and this is her rookie season as a full-time NBA official. She played at George Washington and Old Dominion, then signed a pro contract to play in Ireland. After that she spent seven years reffing Division I games and five seasons in the G League, 215 games in all, before the NBA hired her full-time this year. She's caught a chest pass or two in her life, she just wasn't expecting one from a guy in the front row, and it got her on the arm. So why'd he get tossed? Because of one line in the NBA's fan code of conduct. If you throw an object, you're out, immediately. The rule doesn't say anything about how hard you threw it or whether it was the game ball you were handing back, which means once that ball touches a ref, the security guy walking over has nothing left to decide. And per the code, you leave without a refund, and the team can take your season tickets and keep you out of future games. The NBA made it that strict on purpose. Back in the 2018-19 season, the number of fans thrown out of courtside seats more than doubled, so the league started watching several rows deep instead of just the people with their feet on the floor. If you're sitting courtside now, you're sitting right where security is paying the most attention. And then you've got the guy who flagged it. That was Luka. He's hit 16 technicals in three different seasons, which is supposed to mean an automatic one-game suspension, and every single time the league went back and took the 16th one away. In April 2025 he got ejected in Oklahoma City because a ref thought the trash talk he was yelling at a fan was meant for him. So he knows better than almost anyone how fast a misread split second turns into you walking to the locker room. The league has wiped Luka's 16th technical off his record three separate times so he wouldn't miss a game, and on Wednesday night he got to be the one deciding a fan's chest pass was too much.
引用 @JomboyMedia: “What the f*ck are you doing?”
Fan gets ejected for passing the ball at the referee https://t.co/ATh5iq1vCf
⏰ 05:32 | ❤️ 5765 点赞 | 📝 421词 | 入选: 高赞 5765 / 引用讨论 / 长文 | 查看原文 →
Aakash Gupta
｜ @aakashgupta
｜ 影响力: 33.7万粉丝 · 互动分 4777.5
Aakash Gupta
｜ @aakashgupta
｜ 影响力: 33.7万粉丝 · 互动分 4777.5
💡 核心观点: A guy in Ohio robbed four banks wearing a $650 silicone mask, and the cops arrested the wrong man.（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
A guy in Ohio robbed four banks wearing a $650 silicone mask, and the cops arrested the wrong man. Six of seven bank employees picked the innocent guy out of a lineup. His own mother looked at the security photo and thought it was her son. The robber was Conrad Zdzierak, a white 30-year-old from Poland. The mask was a young Black man's face called "The Player," which he ordered from a little special effects shop in LA called SPFX Masks. The man police arrested sat in jail until Zdzierak's girlfriend found the mask and a pile of cash in his hotel room and called it in. When detectives opened Zdzierak's safe, they found a second mask from the same shop, an old white guy called "The Elder." That same year, a young man wore that exact model onto an Air Canada flight from Hong Kong to Vancouver. Gate staff noticed his hands looked way too young for his face and let him board anyway. He only got caught because he took the mask off in the airplane bathroom and walked back out as a guy in his early twenties. Those were the amateurs, though. Over in France, a crew used the same trick on Skype calls and pulled in €55 million. Gilbert Chikli's people built a replica of the French defense minister's office, flags and a portrait of the president on the wall and everything, and one of them sat behind the desk in a custom mask of the minister, Jean-Yves Le Drian. They'd call rich people and ask for secret money to pay ransoms for French hostages. They tried more than 150 people and only three paid, which still worked out to about €18 million each. The Aga Khan alone wired €20 million over five transfers. Police later found photos of a Prince Albert of Monaco mask on one of their phones, so it looks like they had a sequel planned. What tripped them up with Senegal's president had nothing to do with the face. Macky Sall actually knew Le Drian, and the guy on the call kept calling him "vous," the formal version of "you." Friends in France say "tu." The reason these masks work is kind of clever once you see it. A full-head mask has holes for the eyes and mouth, so the blinking, the eye movement and the lips forming words all come from a real person. In the video you can see the silicone runs all the way down past the collarbones, so there isn't even a line at the chin to catch. Pretty much everything on that face that moves is real. Researchers at York and Kyoto tested this in 2019. They showed people two photos side by side, told them flat out that one was a mask, and people still picked wrong one time in five. When they only got half a second to look, they missed one in three. The researchers think real life is worse, since most people don't even know masks this good exist. They're also way easier to get now. In 2024 a burglar in Shanghai broke into four apartments disguised as an old man, and Chinese sellers told reporters they don't ask buyers for any ID. And all of this happened before most people had even heard the word deepfake.
引用 @antifavxd: essa mascara é realista em um nível extremo https://t.co/m4K1cx1STF
⏰ 12:03 | ❤️ 3492 点赞 | 📝 561词 | 入选: 高赞 3492 / 引用讨论 / 长文 | 查看原文 →
Anthropic
｜ @AnthropicAI
｜ 影响力: 188.4万粉丝 · 互动分 3495.5
Anthropic
｜ @AnthropicAI
｜ 影响力: 188.4万粉丝 · 互动分 3495.5
💡 核心观点: New on our Science Blog: How AI is beginning to change scientific modeling.（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
New on our Science Blog: How AI is beginning to change scientific modeling. Scientific models help researchers explain and predict real-world systems—like how a single nerve cell fires, or what happens when neutron stars collide. Recent advances have transformed how scientists fit complex models to data. But scientists still typically write the models manually, and usually need to weigh up several competing versions, each of which might explain the data in a different way. In a guest post, Jakob Macke, Daniel Gedon, and Stefan Wahl describe how AI is starting to help with these parts of the process. By writing, running, fitting, and revising scientific models as code, AI can explore many possible model structures, and find out which explanations the data support. https://t.co/qsFJG76FDw
⏰ 19:49 | ❤️ 2403 点赞 | 📝 128词 | 入选: 高赞 2403 / 长文 | 查看原文 →
@levelsio
｜ @levelsio
｜ 影响力: 99.0万粉丝 · 互动分 2495.0
@levelsio
｜ @levelsio
｜ 影响力: 99.0万粉丝 · 互动分 2495.0
💡 核心观点: I will publish my full list of 10,000+ blocked AI spammer accounts soon so everyone can block them easily tooo If you w（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
I will publish my full list of 10,000+ blocked AI spammer accounts soon so everyone can block them easily tooo If you write AI replies under my tweets you will now permanently destroy your X account Because you'll very quickly end up in a public data set of AI spammers that people will use to block them Better turn those AI reply bots off today
引用 @levelsio: I will collect all accounts I blocked for AI spam recently and submit them to @dillon_mulroy's list too
I will also send my entire list to @X staff so they can suspend the accounts
If you post AI replies under my tweets I will now go nuclear on you
Only way to keep this platform usable
⏰ 16:08 | ❤️ 1694 点赞 | 📝 65词 | 入选: 高赞 1694 / 引用讨论 | 查看原文 →
ℏεsam
｜ @Hesamation
｜ 影响力: 9.4万粉丝 · 互动分 2408.5
ℏεsam
｜ @Hesamation
｜ 影响力: 9.4万粉丝 · 互动分 2408.5
💡 核心观点: it’s crazy how the Silicon Valley finale ended with AI discovering a math breakthrough that could break up the world’s e（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
it’s crazy how the Silicon Valley finale ended with AI discovering a math breakthrough that could break up the world’s encryption. in the show, the AI wasn’t even trying to break encryption. it just stumbled upon the discovery while recursively improving Pied Piper’s compression algorithm and itself, without any engineers guiding the process. now 7 years later, with OpenAI’s math and Anthropic’s cryptanalysis progress, watching that ending hits a little different. man this show was really ahead of its time, not talking about it “predicting” anything but just the sheer range of things its writers could imagine back then.
⏰ 20:14 | ❤️ 1858 点赞 | 📝 104词 | 入选: 高赞 1858 | 查看原文 →
Chubby♨️
｜ @kimmonismus
｜ 影响力: 15.7万粉丝 · 互动分 2254.0
Chubby♨️
｜ @kimmonismus
｜ 影响力: 15.7万粉丝 · 互动分 2254.0
💡 核心观点: Lets go: looks like Qwen 4 is coming today.（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
Lets go: looks like Qwen 4 is coming today. Brave yourself, OpenAI. Another Open source flagship is dropping. you better compete with GPT-6.2 ;)
引用 @Alibaba_Qwen: The becoming begins. https://t.co/SdWEEuG8F3
⏰ 12:29 | ❤️ 1937 点赞 | 📝 22词 | 入选: 高赞 1937 / 引用讨论 | 查看原文 →
@levelsio
｜ @levelsio
｜ 影响力: 99.0万粉丝 · 互动分 2125.5
@levelsio
｜ @levelsio
｜ 影响力: 99.0万粉丝 · 互动分 2125.5
💡 核心观点: Crypto bros go to Paraguay Forced to open bank account to have ties Bank fails Ironically proving their point（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
Crypto bros go to Paraguay Forced to open bank account to have ties Bank fails Ironically proving their point
⏰ 11:14 | ❤️ 1836 点赞 | 📝 19词 | 入选: 高赞 1836 | 查看原文 →
Chubby♨️
｜ @kimmonismus
｜ 影响力: 15.7万粉丝 · 互动分 1863.5
Chubby♨️
｜ @kimmonismus
｜ 影响力: 15.7万粉丝 · 互动分 1863.5
💡 核心观点: Another major AI research breakthrough: Physical Superintelligence says its research system used a non-public Anthropic （规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
Another major AI research breakthrough: Physical Superintelligence says its research system used a non-public Anthropic model to prove the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture, a central problem in quantum computing that had remained open since 2008. The result helps explain when quantum computers can achieve an exponential advantage over classical computers. PSI says the system found a complete proof on its third day, and the final version was checked with Lean.
引用 @psipbc: Today Physical Superintelligence PBC is announcing a proof of the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture, one of the central open problems in quantum complexity, with major implications for quantum computing speedup.
https://t.co/sAewkKdSOu
Thread 👇
⏰ 16:01 | ❤️ 1416 点赞 | 📝 69词 | 入选: 高赞 1416 / 引用讨论 | 查看原文 →
Marc Lou
｜ @marclou
｜ 影响力: 42.3万粉丝 · 互动分 1770.0
Marc Lou
｜ @marclou
｜ 影响力: 42.3万粉丝 · 互动分 1770.0
💡 核心观点: I got a serious offer of $2.5M for https://t.co/Fz0cUG0u3O, all cash.（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
I got a serious offer of $2.5M for https://t.co/Fz0cUG0u3O, all cash. What would you say?
引用 @marclou: I turned down $1M for TrustMRR.
When the buyer reached out, I had just built the marketplace. I replied that I'd consider it at a higher valuation and a similar vision for the product.
A few weeks passed, and the offer climbed to $1.2M.
I would have to stay onboard for a few months. Having worked…
⏰ 11:42 | ❤️ 946 点赞 | 📝 16词 | 入选: 高赞 946 / 引用讨论 | 查看原文 →
Anthony Pompliano 🌪
｜ @APompliano
｜ 影响力: 244.0万粉丝 · 互动分 1610.9
Anthony Pompliano 🌪
｜ @APompliano
｜ 影响力: 244.0万粉丝 · 互动分 1610.9
💡 核心观点: The faster you learn no politician is coming to save you, the higher your probability of success.（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
The faster you learn no politician is coming to save you, the higher your probability of success.
⏰ 00:24 | ❤️ 1205 点赞 | 📝 17词 | 入选: 高赞 1205 | 查看原文 →
ChatGPT
｜ @ChatGPT
｜ 影响力: 78.3万粉丝 · 互动分 1564.5
ChatGPT
｜ @ChatGPT
｜ 影响力: 78.3万粉丝 · 互动分 1564.5
💡 核心观点: Your teammate built a great site.（规则摘要）
可信度: 50/100
原文内容:
Your teammate built a great site. Naturally, you have notes. With Remix, make your own version of a site by telling ChatGPT what you'd like to change. Then keep editing your copy in chat. Now rolling out to ChatGPT Business and Enterprise accounts. https://t.co/OW3gDwHa4Q
⏰ 22:08 | ❤️ 1126 点赞 | 📝 47词 | 入选: 高赞 1126 | 查看原文 →
🔗 引用关系
- @aakashgupta 引用 @JomboyMedia：A guy got kicked out of an NBA game Wednesday night for throwing the ball back to the ref.（规则摘要）（原文：“What the f*ck are you doing?”
Fan gets ejected for passing the ball at the referee https://t.co/ATh5iq1vCf）
- @aakashgupta 引用 @antifavxd：A guy in Ohio robbed four banks wearing a $650 silicone mask, and the cops arrested the wrong man.（规则摘要）（原文：essa mascara é realista em um nível extremo https://t.co/m4K1cx1STF）
- @levelsio 引用 @levelsio：I will publish my full list of 10,000+ blocked AI spammer accounts soon so everyone can block them easily tooo If you w（规则摘要）（原文：I will collect all accounts I blocked for AI spam recently and submit them to @dillon_mulroy's list too
I will also sen…）
- @kimmonismus 引用 @Alibaba_Qwen：Lets go: looks like Qwen 4 is coming today.（规则摘要）（原文：The becoming begins. https://t.co/SdWEEuG8F3）
- @kimmonismus 引用 @psipbc：Another major AI research breakthrough: Physical Superintelligence says its research system used a non-public Anthropic （规则摘要）（原文：Today Physical Superintelligence PBC is announcing a proof of the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture, one of the central open …）
- @marclou 引用 @marclou：I got a serious offer of $2.5M for https://t.co/Fz0cUG0u3O, all cash.（规则摘要）（原文：I turned down $1M for TrustMRR.
When the buyer reached out, I had just built the marketplace. I replied that I'd consid…）
- @GaryMarcus 引用 @AndrewOrlowski（原文：Oh
https://t.co/5xSJ1As5pE https://t.co/l3GeJqDvV1）
- @marclou 引用 @CloudflareDev：作者抱怨 OpenAI 模型不让自己做防护，并询问非网络安全组织能否进入 Daybreak；他引用一条把编码代理变成安全审计团队的开源技能推文。（原文：With the recent wave of vulnerability disclosures, it’s a good time to take a closer look at your own code.
Turn your c…）
数据来源：X 列表「AI 英文」（22 条候选）· 由 twscrape 采集、grok 整理
© 版权声明
文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。
相关文章
暂无评论...