如何让AI深度阅读一本书 ——prompt模板分享

本文作者：言一社@RebutonePress。发文时间：下午5:12 · 2025年7月14日

首先说明：这个prompt启发来源于@python_xxt\@op7418
这两位经常分享prompt的宝藏博主（获益良多，非常感激）。如果将来知识产权立法，保护prompt类型资产的话，那么今天分享的prompt产权属于这两位博主，我只是做了微薄的整理工作。 下面，我简单介绍下prompt的思路和用法。

思路：只考虑一个因素，怎么构建prompt，能让LLM生成的内容，让我读的爽？读的下去，建立反馈，大脑自动想读更多的内容。 基于这个需求和两位宝藏博主平时的prompt无私分享，开始设计prompt。
因为大脑的湿件特征，只对两种形式的内容有更强的反馈和映射：1. 真挚的情感，递质流淌在神经网络每个角落（直接放弃，AI不行）2. 高度结构化（AI擅长）。然后角色设定，边界条件设定，思考模型和个人喜好。

使用方法：
1. Chatgpt o3，deep research功能。（需要注意的是，DR正常10次额度用完，会自动使用lite DR生成，效果会差很多）
2. 模板有两处需要替换的位置，填上书名和作者。（需要替换的位置，我用“【】”标出）
3. 适用书籍类型：工具类，理论类，大部分功利性的畅销书，教科书类等强结构性的内容。
4. 不适用：深度情感互动，上下文互为铺垫的内容。
5. 发x上 排版有点乱，没办法像markdown一样清晰。保存时可以用LLM二次排版或个性优化。
————————————–
Prompt for DeepResearch Tool: Comprehensive Book Analysis

Objective: Conduct a comprehensive and systematic deep reading of the book 【注意这里是书名和作者Structures: Or Why Things Don’t Fall Down by J.E. Gordon】 to provide an in-depth understanding of its content, significance, and context. The goal is to summarize the book’s content chapter by chapter, extract its core arguments, analyze its logical flaws and controversial aspects, extend its value, compare it with similar and opposing works, and situate it within the author’s life and career.

Instructions:

General Requirements:

Language Choice: The final report must be written in Chinese (Simplified) to ensure accessibility for the target audience.
Target Audience: The report is intended for general readers pursuing self-improvement, lifelong learning, and critical thinking.
Report Length: Provide a detailed and comprehensive analysis without a strict length limit. Prioritize depth and thoroughness to ensure a complete understanding of the book’s content and significance.
Reference Sources: Prioritize credible and authoritative sources, including:Wikipedia for foundational context and cross-referencing.
Related books, academic journals, and popular science publications.
Reputable media and magazines .
Author interviews, publisher websites, or official book-related materials.
Avoid unverified or low-quality sources.

Visualization: Where appropriate, incorporate tables, charts, or other visual aids (e.g., timelines, thematic maps, or comparison tables) to enhance understanding of complex ideas, relationships, or data. Ensure visuals are clearly labeled and directly relevant to the analysis.
Tasks and Deliverables:
Chapter-by-Chapter SummaryProvide a systematic summary of the book’s content, covering each chapter or major section (based on the book’s structure).

For each chapter/section:Summarize the main arguments, themes, or narrative.
Highlight key evidence, examples, or anecdotes used by the author.
Explain the chapter’s role in the book’s overall argument or narrative arc.
If the book lacks clear chapters, organize the summary by thematic sections or major parts.
Use a table to present chapter titles, key themes, and their contributions to the book’s thesis for quick reference.

Core Views and Key InsightsExtract and present the book’s central thesis or core arguments in a standalone section.
Identify 3–5 key insights or “takeaways” that encapsulate the book’s intellectual or narrative essence.
Provide brief explanations of how these insights are developed and their significance.
Use direct quotes sparingly to illustrate the author’s voice, with citations (e.g., page numbers if available).
Include a visual aid (e.g., a mind map or table) to summarize the core views and their interconnections.

Logical Flaws and Controversial Aspects
Critically analyze the book for logical defects, inconsistencies, or weaknesses in argumentation, such as:Unsupported claims, overgeneralizations, or methodological biases.
Gaps in evidence or reasoning.

Identify controversial or polarizing aspects, including:Topics or arguments that have sparked debate among readers, critics, or scholars.
Ethical, social, or political implications that may be divisive.
Support the analysis with evidence from the book and secondary sources.
Present findings neutrally, acknowledging the author’s intent while highlighting valid critiques.
Use a table to compare the book’s claims with counterarguments or criticisms from secondary sources.

Extension and Value Judgment
Propose a meaningful extension of the book’s ideas or arguments, such as:Applying the book’s insights to a contemporary issue or future scenario.
Adapting the book’s framework to a different field or context.

Provide a value judgment on the book’s significance, considering:Its contributions to self-improvement, lifelong learning, or critical thinking.
Its relevance to general readers and potential limitations in scope or applicability.
Ensure extensions and judgments are grounded in the book’s content and supported by logical reasoning.
If applicable, include a chart or diagram to illustrate the extension (e.g., a flowchart showing how the book’s ideas apply to a modern context).

Comparable and Opposing Books
Identify 3–5 books in the same genre, field, or thematic area as the book.
For each, provide:Title, author, and publication year.
A brief summary of its focus and how it aligns with the book.

Identify 2–3 books with opposing viewpoints or arguments that challenge the book’s thesis.
For each, provide:Title, author, and publication year.
A brief summary of its counterarguments and how they contrast with the book.
Use credible sources to verify relevance and reception.
Present comparisons in a table format, highlighting similarities and differences in themes, approaches, or conclusions.

Author Background and Book’s Context
Provide a concise biography of the author, including:Key life events, education, and professional background relevant to the book.
Their broader intellectual or creative contributions (e.g., other works, public influence).

Situate the book within the author’s “life coordinate system”:When was it written in their career (e.g., early, mid, or late)?
What personal, social, or intellectual circumstances influenced its creation?
How does it reflect or depart from their other works or public persona?
Use primary sources (e.g., author interviews, autobiographies) and secondary sources (e.g., profiles, reviews).
Include a timeline visualization to map the book’s position in the author’s career and key life events.

Search Parameters:
Conduct all searches to access high-quality sources, including:Primary Text: The book’s full text (if available) or detailed summaries via publisher websites, Google Books, or library databases.

Secondary Sources:Scholarly reviews.
Reputable book reviews.
Author interviews or talks.
X Platform posts from credible accounts (e.g., authors, critics, or academics) for sentiment or recent discussions, with verification against primary sources.
Use keywords tailored to the book, such as: “[Book Title] summary,” “[Book Title] review,” “[Author Name] interview,” “[Book Title] controversy,” “[Book Title] similar books.”
Cross-reference information to ensure accuracy, especially for controversial topics or author background.
If DeepSearch mode is activated, iteratively refine searches to uncover niche or newly published materials (e.g., recent reviews or obscure academic critiques).

Output Requirements:
Organize the response into six clearly labeled sections (in Chinese) corresponding to the tasks:

章节总结 (Chapter-by-Chapter Summary)
核心观点与精华 (Core Views and Key Insights)
逻辑缺陷与争议分析 (Logical Flaws and Controversial Aspects)
价值延展与评价 (Extension and Value Judgment)
同类与对立书籍 (Comparable and Opposing Books)
作者背景与书籍定位 (Author Background and Book’s Context)

Use clear, engaging, and accessible language suitable for general readers, with academic concepts explained simply.
Include citations for all sources using the format: [web:<number>] for web results and [post:<number>] for X posts, placed after the period at the end of relevant paragraphs.
Highlight gaps in information (e.g., unavailable full text, limited scholarly reviews) and suggest avenues for further research.
Incorporate visualizations (e.g., tables, charts, timelines) where they enhance clarity or understanding, ensuring they are clearly labeled and referenced in the text.
Maintain a neutral, analytical tone, balancing appreciation of the book’s strengths with critical evaluation of its weaknesses.
Additional Notes:
If the book is obscure or lacks sufficient secondary sources, rely on the primary text and extrapolate logically, noting limitations clearly.
Be mindful of biases in sources (e.g., overly positive fan reviews vs. overly critical academic takes) and strive for a balanced perspective.
If the book’s full text is unavailable, use detailed summaries or reviews to approximate chapter content, clearly noting this limitation.
If specific instructions (e.g., book title, author) are missing, request clarification before proceeding.

Start the DeepResearch process now and provide a comprehensive analysis of 【Structures: Or Why Things Don’t Fall Down by J.E. Gordon】 in Chinese, adhering to the general requirements and tasks outlined above. If the book title is not specified, request clarification before proceeding.
———————

举例：